1.
Friends
of the Los Angeles River,
Coalition for Clean Air,
Anahuak Soccer Club,
and Natural Resources
Defense Council in
opposing an industrial and
commercial development by
Lennar Corporation at the
Taylor Yard, and
supporting instead State
acquisition of the
property for a Park.
We were lead
counsel and prevailed in
the lawsuit.
Lennar subsequently
negotiated with the State
to sell the land, which
the State acquired for
development as a State
Park.
Approval of the
funds for Park acquisition
were announced by Governor
Gray Davis at a press
conference in December
2001, as part of the
State’s largest urban
park creation in recent
history.
2.
The
Friends of the Los
Angeles River, Chinese
Consolidated Benevolent
Society of Los Angeles,
Concerned Citizens of
South Central Los Angeles,
Environmental Defense,
Latino Urban Forum,
Natural Resources
Defense Council, and Northeast
Renaissance Corporation
in opposing a variance and
site plan review
application for an
industrial warehouse
project in an area of
Chinatown in Los Angeles
referred to as the
Cornfields and
Riverstation.
We were lead
counsel and joined by the
Natural Resources Defense
Council, Environmental
Defense and numerous
community groups in
opposing Majestic Realty
Corporation’s
application on the grounds
of CEQA, municipal code,
and environmental justice
violations.
As a result of
litigation and
administrative action,
Majestic agreed to sell
the property to the Trust
for Public Land, which
sold the property to the
State for development as a
State Park.
Governor Gray Davis
announced this acquisition
as part of the State’s
largest urban park
creation in recent history
at the December 2001 press
conference mentioned
above.
3.
The
National Parks and
Conservation Association
and a number of local
organizations and
individuals opposing the
proposed Eagle Mountain
landfill, which would be
the largest landfill in
the country and is
proposed to be located
immediately adjacent to
Joshua Tree National Park. In 1994, a lawsuit resulted in Riverside County having to
prepare a new EIR on the
proposed project.
As a result of our
objections to the EIR that
was prepared in response
to the 1994 court order,
in February, 1998 the San
Diego County Superior
Court judge hearing the
matter again set the EIR
aside.
Riverside County
successfully appealed the
decision, but the project
is now being fought in
federal court and, six
years later, the project
still has not been
started.
4.
Rescue
Our Canyon
and Friends of Runyon
Canyon, litigating in
federal court a suit
against the Los Angeles
Metropolitan
Transportation Authority.
The issue of
concern was the proposed
dewatering of the Santa
Monica Mountains as part
of construction of the
subway from Hollywood to
the Valley.
We achieved a
settlement that will
protect wildlife and
vegetation by eliminating
dewatering under surface
springs and will reduce
the drawdown of the water
table under Runyon Canyon
Park, as well as the other areas along the route through the Santa Monica Mountains.
Coastal
Resources and Tidelands
5.
Wetlands
Action Network, Sierra
Club, Ballona
Wetlands Lands Trust,
and Coalition to Save
the Marina in
challenging a coastal
development permit for a
project to dam, drain and
dredge a wetland, and then
construct concrete walls
along the intertidal area
of the wetland, under the
guise of being a wetland
“restoration” project.
The wetland is
known as the Grand Canal,
and is an Environmentally
Sensitive Habitat Area in
the City of Los Angeles.
We obtained a stay
order from the San
Francisco Superior Court
to suspend the
environmentally damaging
portions of the Coastal
Commission’s approval of
the coastal development
permit.
Subsequently, the
Superior Court ruled in
our favor, holding that
there was not substantial
evidence that there were
not feasible, less
damaging alternatives to
dredging and to
construction of the walls.
6.
Wetlands
Action Network
in a challenge to a
Coastal Commission
decision to approve the
North Shores project in
the Coastal Zone of
Ventura County.
We were co-counsel
with the Environmental
Defense Center, which
represents the Native
Plant Society and the
Sierra Club in this
matter.
After the trial
court denied the
challenge, the matter was
settled, with a
substantial additional
amount of mitigation of
impacts on a threatened
species being obtained.
7.
Natural
Resources Defense Council
(NRDC),
San Pedro and Peninsula
Homeowners’ Coalition,
San Pedro Peninsula
Homeowners United, Inc.,
and Coalition for Clean
Air, Inc., in a
challenge to the Port of
Los Angeles’ approval of
a significant expansion of
dock capacity for China
Shipping Company without
conducting environmental
review.
We were co-counsel
with NRDC attorneys in
this case.
While the trial
court denied a writ, the
court of appeal reversed
the trial court and stayed
further construction and
all operations until an
EIR is prepared.
As a result,
Petitioners were able to
settle the litigation so
that the Port committed to
pay $50 million over five
years for mitigation of
air quality, traffic, and
aesthetic impacts from
terminal expansion in
exchange for the right to
operate the first phase of
the terminal before
completion of the new EIR.
8.
The
California Earth Corps
in opposing an agreement
between the City of Long
Beach and the State Land
Commission (SLC) in which
SLC would remove public
trust restrictions from
three acres of tidelands
to facilitate construction
of a bookstore, a spa, and
a movie theater as part of
a private developer’s
project called the
Queensway Bay Development.
The Sacramento
Superior Court denied the
petition for a writ, but
we successfully obtained a
reversal in the Court of
Appeal.
After the Court of
Appeal’s decision, the
Legislature amended Public
Resources Code section
6307 in response to our
lawsuit.
9.
The
California Earth Corps,
an environmental
organization, in
administrative proceedings
before the City of Long
Beach regarding commercial
development of a coastal
area property and
amendment of the City’s
Local Coastal Plan, and
before the San Diego
Regional Water Quality
Control Board regarding
thermal discharge from San
Onofre Nuclear Power
Plant.
10.
Save
Our NTC,
a community group in San
Diego opposing an
agreement between the City
of San Diego and the State
Land Commission (SLC) in
which SLC would remove
public trust restrictions
from more than 300 acres
of tidelands at the north
end of San Diego Bay.
Contrary to the
state Constitution, the
City conveyed
approximately 70 acres of
the tidelands to a private
developer for residential
housing development.
The case settled
before a court decision.
Sensitive
Natural Resources
11.
Sierra
Club,
the Santa Clarita
Organization for Planning
the Environment, and Friends
of the Santa Clara River,
in opposing the proposed
Newhall Ranch housing
development in northern
Los Angeles County.
The development
would be one of the
largest single housing
developments proposed in
California and cause
significant adverse
environmental impacts.
Also opposing the
project were the
California Attorney
General, Ventura County,
and housing advocates.
Our office
concentrated attention on
the inconsistencies of the
proposed project with Los
Angeles’ General Plan.
We prevailed on
this claim at the trial
court, as did several
other petitioners with
their claims related to
water supply, traffic, air
quality, and other
impacts.
Rather than appeal
the trial court’s
decision, Newhall Land and
Farm and the County of Los
Angeles decided to conduct
further work modify the
project and produce and
adequate environmental
impact report.
In January 2002,
the County of Los Angeles
chose to postpone its
review of the project
until water supply sources
could be assured, then
reapproved the project in
May 2003.
12.
Sierra
Club
and Sierra Nevada
Forest Protection Campaign
in protecting Sierra
Nevada forests by
challenging the
implementation of the
Forest Service’s plan
for a post-fire harvest.
The harvest would
have only removed large
trees and would have left
smaller, more combustible
trees and debris in place.
As co-counsel with
Sierra Club, we obtained a
TRO, which is still in
place.
13.
The
Surfrider Foundation,
in an effort to mitigate
the impact of the siting
of a Carnival Cruise Line
terminal at a location
that would effectively
preclude the removal of a
breakwater in Long Beach
which would improve water
quality and restore more
natural surf conditions. As part of a settlement of this matter, Carnival Cruise Line
agreed to support a study
for reconfiguration of the
breakwater, and other
mitigation for the impacts
of the project.
14.
The
Bluewater Action
Network, Surfrider
Foundation, Environmental
Law Foundation, and San
Diego Baykeeper in an
Unfair Competition Act
lawsuit against four major
cruise lines for violation
of the Ballast Water
Management for the Control
of Nonindigenous Species
Act.
In settlement with
three of the cruise lines,
we obtained a commitment
to future compliance with
the law and created a fund
to analyze alternative
ballast water management
practices.
We obtained a
stipulated judgment
against the final
defendant, Carnival Cruise
Lines, for declaratory and
injunctive relief.
15.
The
Orange County
Coastkeeper, in
challenging the waiver of
water quality
certification for an
enormous development
project located next to a
state park and Area of
Special Biological
Concern, the Crystal Cove.
A settlement with
the developer was
eventually achieved.
16.
Friends
of the Los Angeles River,
Heal the Bay, TreePeople
and eight other
environmental and
community groups
in opposing
construction of parapet
walls along the Los
Angeles River, and
supporting the alternative
of a comprehensive
watershed management plan.
This entailed
extensive comments on two
environmental impact
reports.
The first set of
comments was instrumental
in convincing the County
of Los Angeles to prepare
a Subsequent EIR.
Unfortunately, the
second document was still
inadequate.
We filed a writ of
mandate under the
California Environmental
Quality Act against the
County, and succeeded in
having the matter remanded
for reconsideration by the
Board of Supervisors.
Although the Board
re-approved the project,
it set up a process to
evaluate alternatives to
the parapet walls and
agreed to initiate
preparation of a watershed
management plan.
17.
Endangered
Habitat League,
Friends of Tecate
Cypress, Hills For
Everyone, and Tri-County
Conservation League,
community-based
environmental
organizations centered in
Orange County in
administrative review of
an EIR prepared for the
Southern California
Association of
Government’s (SCAG) 1998
Draft Regional
Transportation Plan. Two roadways alignments opposed by our clients were
eventually removed by SCAG
from the Regional
Transportation Plan.
18.
Sierra
Club
during the administrative
process in opposing
development of the
Gillette Ranch in the
Santa Monica Mountains by
SOKA University based upon
CEQA and planning laws.
19.
People
for Parks,
advising them regarding
issues relating to public
access to Santa Monica
Mountains Conservancy
property in Escondido
Canyon.
20.
TAPPS,
a Los Osos organization,
opposing a traditional
wastewater treatment
plant, which would destroy
sensitive habitat, and
supporting an alternative
technology that would also
have the benefit of
groundwater recharged.
Historic
Resources
21.
Long
Beach Heritage,
a community-based historic
and preservation society,
in challenging the Board
of Harbor Commissioners’
approval for the Port of
Long Beach’s Pier T
Terminal project.
The Pier T Terminal
project proposed to
demolish the Long Beach
Naval Station which was
designed by Paul Revere
Williams, who is probably
the best known and most
accomplished
African-American architect
of all time.
Long Beach Heritage
wanted a review, prior to
demolition, of possible
reuses that would preserve
the historic buildings. We prevailed in the trial court, and the City of Long Beach
appealed.
Subsequent to the
trial court’s decision,
the United States Navy and
the City of Long Beach
initiated preparation of a
new, more comprehensive,
combined EIR/EIS with a
reuse plan.
Our clients settled
out of the case, but the
City of Long Beach’s
appeal continued and was
opposed by the Cities of
Compton and Vernon.
This appeal was
eventually successful.
During the pendency
of the appeal, Congress
enacted legislation
preventing a prospective
tenant from using the
Naval Station as a
container terminal.
22.
Along
with the 1996 winner of
the State Bar award for
pro bono work for this
District, Marcia Scully,
and Jan Chatten-Brown
represented the Lincoln
Place Tenants Association
in opposing the demolition
of 795 units of affordable
housing in Venice.
The grounds for
opposition were primarily
that the project conflicts
with the City Housing
Element and the 1994
Comprehensive Housing
Affordability Strategy,
and that the Environmental
Impact Report was
inadequate. The Los
Angeles City Council
reversed the decision of
the Advisory Agency and
the Planning Commission,
and denied the project.
The developer
challenged the denial, and
the City’s denial was
set aside as being
inconsistent with the
Ellis Act and in 2002, the
City approved the project.
The Lincoln
Place Tenants Association
challenged the approval on
CEQA grounds, since the
EIR ignored the cultural
significance of the
existing complex, which
has now been determined to
be eligible for listing on
the National Register of
Historic Places.
We served as
co-counsel with historic
preservation specialist
Susan Brandt-Hawley.
We also represented
20th Century
Architecture Alliance,
California Preservation
Foundation, Los
Angeles Conservancy
and National
Organization of Minority
Architects in fighting
the demolition of Lincoln
Place based upon a
violation of a local
preservation ordinance and
CEQA.
Though we lost in
the trial court, the Court
of Appeal reversed the
trial court’s ruling,
granting the writ we
sought.
HOMEOWNERS’
AND COMMUNITY GROUPS
23.
The
Blair Hills Residents
Association, in
opposing a large
residential development.
Because we were
successful in delaying
commencement of the
project, the State was
able to use Proposition 12
funds to acquire the 65
acres for addition to the
State Park in Baldwin
Hills.
24.
The
Coalition for a Better
Inglewood and the Los
Angeles Alliance for a New
Economy in challenging
an initiative proposed by
the Wal-Mart retail
corporation to build a
commercial retail complex
in Inglewood.
The initiative
would have approved the
construction of a project
the size of seventeen
football fields at a site
next to the Hollywood Park
Racetrack without
environmental or
administrative review by
city officials and
planning professionals.
In response to a
petition we filed, a judge
chose not to evaluate the
legality of the initiative
before an election was
held.
At a special
municipal election, the
initiative was defeated by
the opposition of over 60%
of those voting on the
measure.
25.
The
Greenlight Steering
Committee in obtaining
appropriate regulations to
enforce an initiative
passed by Newport Beach
voters. The Greenlight initiative requires voter ratification of
general plan amendments
that allow significant new
development in the City.
This case is
pending in Orange County
Superior Court.
26.
The
Chatsworth Land
Preservation Association
in challenging a
high-density residential
development in the heart
of horse country in the
northern portion of the
City of Los Angeles.
The development as
proposed threatened the
continued viability of the
Chatsworth area as a
horsekeeping community and
impeded the ability of the
community to continue to
enjoy recreational horse
riding along an important
route.
We obtained a court
ruling in the group’s
favor stating the proposed
development was
inconsistent with the
general plan and the
City’s use of a
mitigated negative
declaration for its
approval was an abuse of
discretion.
The developer, the
property owner, and the
city successfully appealed
the ruling.
27.
The
Hermosa Beach Stop Oil
Coalition (HBSOC) and
environmental groups
opposing a coastal oil
drilling project in the
City of Hermosa Beach that
would result in the first
new slant drilling into
Santa Monica Bay since the
oil and gas sanctuary was
established in 1953.
In this context, we
obtained a writ of mandate
against the State Lands
Commission for violation
of the Public Resources
Code section controlling
oil drilling in the
coastal zone.
Unfortunately, the
State Lands Commission
re-approved the project.
Later, we obtained
a writ of mandate against
the City for violation of
its own zoning code, but
the trial court decision
was reversed in the Court
of Appeal.
A third action for
injunctive relief has been
instituted to seek
enforcement of an
initiative measure passed
in 1995, which precludes
oil drilling in Hermosa
Beach.
In January, 2001,
the California Court of
Appeal agreed with
essentially every argument
we made, reversed the
trial court, and approved
application of the
initiative to the oil
drilling project.
This constituted a
complete victory for
petitioners.
28.
The
Los Feliz Improvement
Association, in
opposing approval by the
City of Los Angeles of a
proposal to build a three
story museum in Griffith
Park on the basis of a
mitigated negative
declaration.
After we brought
suit challenging the
approval, the proponent of
the museum withdrew its
proposal and committed to
preparing an environmental
impact report before
pursuing any further
application. Now two separate Children Museums are being built, one
downtown, and one out in
the Valley, at locations
that many feel better
serves the City’s
interests.
29.
The Cornell
Preservation Organization
(CPO), a Santa Monica
Mountains residents
association, in supporting
a reduction in allowable
densities by the Los
Angeles Board of
Supervisors, and opposing
a local residential
development.
In November 2000,
CPO was one of the primary
advocates for the General
Plan amendment approved by
the Board of Supervisors.
Since then, CPO was
key in requiring
environmental review for
another development.
30.
Friends
of Friendship Park
and three other groups
seeking to set aside
approval of an
inappropriate development
in the Deane Dana
Friendship Community
Regional County Park in
Palos Verdes.
We achieved an
acceptable settlement
through negotiations with
the current Supervisor,
who support agreed with
our clients support for a
“smaller and lower.”
31.
Three
San Juan Capistrano
homeowner associations
in seeking abatement of a
nuisance created by a
greenwaste composting
facility in close
proximity to residents,
and seeking to have the
facility moved to another
site, based upon planning
and zoning laws.
32.
Pasadena
Residents Association
in challenging the failure
of the City of Pasadena to
prepare an Environmental
Impact Report regarding a
major modification of a
Conditional Use Permit for
a commercial project to
include 16 screen
theaters.
33.
Shadow
Oaks Homeowners’
Association
in opposing the siting of
a bus terminal near their
homes, when a more remote
site, that would not
present the same adverse
public health and
aesthetic impacts.
After we sent a
letter opposing the nearby
site, the City Council
directed their staff to
focus on the remote
location.
34.
We
have represented numerous
homeowners groups
concerned about the
impacts of various
developments in local
government administrative
processes, appearing
before zoning
administrators, appeals
boards, planning
commissions and city
councils.
Such projects
include the proposed
expansion in the City of
Los Angeles of the Yeshiva
School in City Council
District Five, and the
Marlborough School in City
Council District Four.
35.
By
participating in the
administrative process
through comment or
evaluation letters, we
have frequently convinced
public agencies to prepare
a full environmental
impact report or to
conduct environmental
review that the public
agency otherwise did not
intend to undertake. Such
public agencies include
the cities of Lancaster,
Palmdale, Hawthorne, Palos
Verdes, and Torrance.
COMMERCIAL
AND GOVERNMENT CLIENTS
40.
The
University of California
at Los Angeles, in
evaluation of environmental
documentation for an
expansion of a
family-housing complex owned
by the university.
We provided critical
evaluation of an
environmental impact report
in order to identify
possible weaknesses in its
discussion of various
issues.