CHATTEN-BROWN*, CARSTENS & MINTEER
  • Home
  • Firm Background
  • Our Team
    • Douglas Carstens
    • Amy Minteer
    • Michelle Black
    • Sunjana Supekar
    • Cynthia Kellman
  • Practice Areas
    • CEQA
    • Land Use
    • Historic Preservation Laws
    • Endangered Species Act
    • Coastal Act
    • Timber Harvesting Laws
    • Public Records Act and Brown Act
    • Election Law
    • NEPA
    • Clean Air Laws
    • Clean Water Laws
    • Mining and Oil Drilling Laws
  • F.A.Q.s
  • News
  • Resources
    • Articles
    • Links
  • Contact Us

NEPA

Chatten-Brown, Carstens & Minteer has done considerable work under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), both in administrative processes and in federal court.  For example, CBCM attorneys represented the City of South Pasadena in opposing the extension of the 710 Freeway through the City.  CBCM was part of a team of consultants for the City, and the one primarily responsible for development of the air quality and environmental justice arguments against the freeway extension, and in support of a low build multi-modal alternative. After the Federal Highway Administration issued a Record of Decision to extend the 710 Freeway, the firm joined with other counsel in challenging the approval on NEPA, Clean Air Act, and historic preservation grounds.  A federal district court granted a preliminary injunction against further development of the project.  Subsequently, the federal government indicated it would prepare a supplemental Environmental Impact Statement.  Later, the State withdrew the Notice of Determination for the EIR on the route, and agreed that this action nullifies the route.  (City of South Pasadena v. Slater (1999) 56 F.Supp.2d 1106.)
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.